If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby Deke in TX on Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:45 am

IF YOU WANT TO CULTIVATE PEACE, PROTECT CREATION
Is the title of Benedict XVI's speech for World Peace Day 2010. Regardless of whether one believes that "Global Warming" is a reality or is caused by human activities, we do have a responsibility to be good stewards of God's creation. Ecological disasters have occurred which which are the result of human exploitation that are not part of the "warming" debate. The collapse of Atlantic cod and various salmon runs in the past few years ought to be a bright amber caution light that we need to take a long hard look at how we do things.There are places around the world that have been made too dangerous by chemical poisoning, radiation and unexploded munitions (parts of France are off limits because of WW I munitions).

Below is from an article on the talk from the National Catholic Reporter and below that is from the speech itself with links.
At the level of specific policy measures, Benedict XVI advocated:

* A new mode of calculating the cost of economic activity, which would factor in environmental impact;
* Greater investment in solar energy and other forms of energy with a reduced environmental footprint;
* Strategies of rural development concentrated on small-scale farmers and their families;
* Progressive disarmament, including “a world free of nuclear weapons.”

While saying that primary responsibility for taking action must fall to wealthy industrialized nations, Benedict pointedly added that less developed nations “cannot be exonerated from their own responsibility.” Exactly how much less developed nations should be expected to curb emissions, and to take other steps potentially limiting their economic growth, has been a major sticking point at the Copenhagen summit.

At the same time, Benedict XVI wasn’t simply issuing a set of political talking points. He also insisted that protecting the environment is “the duty of every person,” one which demands changes in personal habits and attitudes.

Benedict called for “new styles of life,” based not solely upon the logic of consumption but also “sobriety and solidarity,” as well as “prudence.”

Benedict linked environmental protection to other core values, such as the right to life “in every phase and in every condition,” and the family. He cautioned against a “new pantheism with neo-pagan accents” that would elevate nature into an absolute value, at the expense of human dignity.

National Catholic Reporter

IF YOU WANT TO CULTIVATE PEACE, PROTECT CREATION

The harmony between the Creator, mankind and the created world, as described by Sacred Scripture, was disrupted by the sin of Adam and Eve, by man and woman, who wanted to take the place of God and refused to acknowledge that they were his creatures. As a result, the work of “exercising dominion” over the earth, “tilling it and keeping it”, was also disrupted, and conflict arose within and between mankind and the rest of creation (cf. Gen 3:17-19). Human beings let themselves be mastered by selfishness; they misunderstood the meaning of God’s command and exploited creation out of a desire to exercise absolute domination over it. But the true meaning of God’s original command, as the Book of Genesis clearly shows, was not a simple conferral of authority, but rather a summons to responsibility. The wisdom of the ancients had recognized that nature is not at our disposal as “a heap of scattered refuse”.[10] Biblical Revelation made us see that nature is a gift of the Creator, who gave it an inbuilt order and enabled man to draw from it the principles needed to “till it and keep it” (cf. Gen. 2:15).[11] Everything that exists belongs to God, who has entrusted it to man, albeit not for his arbitrary use. Once man, instead of acting as God’s co-worker, sets himself up in place of God, he ends up provoking a rebellion on the part of nature, “which is more tyrannized than governed by him”.[12] Man thus has a duty to exercise responsible stewardship over creation, to care for it and to cultivate it.[13]



[1] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 198.

[2] Benedict XVI, Message for the 2008 World Day of Peace, 7.

[3] Cf. No.48.

[4] Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy, Paradiso, XXXIII, 145.

[5] Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 1.

[6] Apostolic Letter Octogesima Adveniens, 21.

[7] Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 10.

[8] Cf. Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 32.

[9] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 295.

[10] Heraclitus of Ephesus (c. 535 – c. 475 B.C.), Fragment 22B124, in H. Diels-W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Weidmann, Berlin,1952, 6th ed.

[11] Cf. Benedict XVI,Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 48.

[12] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus, 37.

[13] Cf. Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 50.

2010 World Day of Peace
"Pace e Bene!
Deke in TX
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:30 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby chuck on Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:08 am

God is of course the original environmentalist. God created a world/universe that recycles everything... God waists nothing... pretty smart dude.

The tragedy and offense of the whole "Global Warming" carbon credit scam... is that it is all about a multi-trillion dollar take over of the energy market... and the ones who will suffer the most are the little people... the very ones that we are called upon to protect. The deception is amazing.... and they are using a very godly and noble theme, environmentalism, to deceive and push their evil agenda... wolves in sheep's clothing.
A dog thinks it's Master exists for the dog's benefit and enjoyment... when in fact the dog exists for it's Master's benefit and pleasure.
May we have more sense than a dog.
chuck
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby chuck on Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:25 am

Europol (the European Law Enforcement Cooperation) has discovered that up to 90% of Europe's carbon trading industry (Emission Trading System, or ETS, the equivalent of our "Cap and Trade" thing) has been conducted under fraud. Europe enacted the carbon trading industry a couple of years ago that our Al Gore and others are trying so hard to establish in North America.

Europol report
Carbon Credit fraud causes more than 5 billion euros damage for European Taxpayer

The Hague - The Netherlands.

The European Union (EU) Emission Trading System (ETS) has been the victim of fraudulent traders in the past 18 months. This resulted in losses of approximately 5 billion euros for several national tax revenues. It is estimated that in some countries, up to 90% of the whole market volume was caused by fraudulent activities.

Indications of suspicious trading activities were noted in late 2008, when several market platforms saw an unprecedented increase in the trade volume of European Unit Allowances (EUAs). Market volume peaked in May 2009, with several hundred million EUAs traded in e.g. in France and Denmark. At that time the market price of 1 EUA, which equals 1 ton of carbon dioxide, was around EUR 12,5.

As an immediate measure to prevent further losses France, the Netherlands, the UK and most recently Spain, have all changed their taxation rules on these transactions. After these measures were taken, the market volume in the aforementioned countries dropped by up to 90 percent. ....

This is part of my concern mentioned in my previous post here.

God Bless,

Chuck
A dog thinks it's Master exists for the dog's benefit and enjoyment... when in fact the dog exists for it's Master's benefit and pleasure.
May we have more sense than a dog.
chuck
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby Deke in TX on Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:37 am

Does the fact that there are bad people, corporations and governments negate the need to do the right thing? There will always be those who attempt to defraud for their own profit- they weigh the risks against their advantage- it needs to be to their advantage to do the right thing.
"Pace e Bene!
Deke in TX
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:30 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby revlurch on Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:16 am

Deke in TX wrote:Does the fact that there are bad people, corporations and governments negate the need to do the right thing? There will always be those who attempt to defraud for their own profit- they weigh the risks against their advantage- it needs to be to their advantage to do the right thing.


This masquerade of man-made global warming is not the right thing. It is pulling resources away from things that will actually help the environment and help people. If 90% of the system is fraudulent, how is that helping the environment?

fraud⋅u⋅lent
–adjective
1. characterized by, involving, or proceeding from fraud, as actions, enterprise, methods, or gains: a fraudulent scheme to evade taxes.
2. given to or using fraud, as a person; cheating; dishonest.
revlurch
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby Deke in TX on Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:49 pm

How come no one who says that "human caused" global warming is not real yet refuse to answer how taking sequestered carbon (buried deep in the ground) and burning it has no effect on our world? Stuff that wasn't in the air and sea is now there because of our industry. Not even thinking about global warming do you think that we will survive if CO2 rises to say 10% of our atmosphere? Will we be able to breath with O2 decreased by the same amount?
"Pace e Bene!
Deke in TX
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:30 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby revlurch on Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:33 am

Deke in TX wrote:How come no one who says that "human caused" global warming is not real yet refuse to answer how taking sequestered carbon (buried deep in the ground) and burning it has no effect on our world? Stuff that wasn't in the air and sea is now there because of our industry. Not even thinking about global warming do you think that we will survive if CO2 rises to say 10% of our atmosphere? Will we be able to breath with O2 decreased by the same amount?


You're making a lot of assumptions (like there will be no increase in plant life to take in excess carbon dioxide). Besides, it's stuff like this that gives me pause:
Detroit News
Great Lakes shipping sails rough waters wrote:In another odd twist, the industry has been hampered since 2000 by six years of declining lake levels.

Each lost inch of water cut into the amount of materials ships could carry.

But this month, the lakes are back to within an inch or two of their historic averages. And with no demand for materials right now, shipping companies are unable to capitalize. emphasis mine

So the Great Lakes are back to historic averages because there has been more snow the past few years "up north" (Upper Peninsula of MI for example) and therefore more water in the Great Lakes. But I thought we would be seeing less precipitation and drying lakes? It seems to me that every time the climate change believers come up with a dire situation, I find that it is not quite as dire as they claim.

I am all for being a responsible steward of God's creation but what Al Gore and those who follow him are advocating is not responsible stewardship. Not once have I heard a definition of what is the "normal" climate. For my region would that be the ice age or the current temperate climate? Maybe it is somewhere in between?
revlurch
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby Deke in TX on Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:21 am

All carbon taken up by plant life eventually returns to the atmosphere - whether by fire or decay. And where is all this extra plant life going to grow- on the Sahara, the Gobi or Mohave? How about if we tear down all the houses, industrial plants, malls, parking lots, streets and roads and plant all that to trees? How will that be? Where is all this extra carbon going to go? It is acidifying the oceans and how much more can they absorb?

You can make all the arguments about Al Gore you want. I don't really give a bat's sh*t about what he has to say. I know that you cannot keep adding something in a system without it changing in some way. It's not your breathing or cows belching that is the problem it's what's coming out of our cars' tailpipes. So what are we going to do about it?
Just asking.
"Pace e Bene!
Deke in TX
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:30 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby chuck on Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:31 pm

Science Daily
No Rise of Airborne Fraction of Carbon Dioxide in Past 150 Years, New Research Finds
ScienceDaily (Dec. 31, 2009) — Most of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity does not remain in the atmosphere, but is instead absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. In fact, only about 45 percent of emitted carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere.

However, some studies have suggested that the ability of oceans and plants to absorb carbon dioxide recently may have begun to decline and that the airborne fraction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions is therefore beginning to increase....

In case you all might have missed this from a week or so ago, this interesting tidbit comes from the professional journal, Science Daily.

Whatever the actual facts end up being, this sort of naturalizes the influence of CO2 being the culprit behind any actual recent global warming.

Just interesting... and confusing... esp when folks want to control the carbon market and we get reports like this.
A dog thinks it's Master exists for the dog's benefit and enjoyment... when in fact the dog exists for it's Master's benefit and pleasure.
May we have more sense than a dog.
chuck
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:29 pm

Re: If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation

Postby Deke in TX on Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:58 pm

Here's the link to Science Daily story. On first look I would say that Science Daily is not a professional journal but more of a clearing house publishing from various sources that may or may not be peer review.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 184221.htm

Regardless of the cause-global average temperatures are rising along with sea levels along coastal plains and low lying islands where people live and are being squeeze out as their land disappears. Who here is willing to give them a new place to live? No room at the Inn - Leviticus 24:22, “You shall have but one rule, for alien and native alike. I, the LORD, am your God."

Shelter From the Storms
Maryann Cusimano Love | JANUARY 4, 2010

Environmental refugees are the new refugee challenge. Our laws and institutions do not recognize them, yet because of global climate change, their numbers are growing quickly. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns that we may face 150 million environmental refugees by 2050; U.N.H.C.R. warns of 250 million. That would be four to six times the number of refugees and internally displaced persons (42 million combined) we struggle to serve now.

The problem is all too real. The U.N. University’s Institute for Environment and Human Security estimates there are already more environmental refugees than political refugees: 50 million, compared with 15 million traditional refugees. Island countries like the Republic of Kiribati, the Maldives, Tuvalu and parts of Bangladesh and Papua New Guinea are disappearing and are already relocating their people. Populous countries like India and Indonesia are vulnerable. The world’s poorest people bear most of the cost of climate change, though they contribute least to the problem. Of the 26 countries deemed by most observers to be the most vulnerable to climate change impacts, 23 are in Africa. The U.N. high commissioner for refugees, Antonio Guterres, notes that from Sudan to Rwanda the combined impact of conflict, environmental and economic factors challenges our existing categories for refugees.

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/ ... e_id=12074
"Pace e Bene!
Deke in TX
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:30 pm


Return to All Topics and Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Deke in TX and 1 guest